Return to CreateDebate.comamericanlit • Join this debate community

OA-BCIG American Lit


Debate Info

33
23
Tougher laws More education
Debate Score:56
Arguments:55
Total Votes:57
Ended:04/29/14
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Tougher laws (30)
 
 More education (23)

Debate Creator

HSpetman(33) pic



This debate has ended. You can no longer add arguments or vote in this debate.

Official Debate: Distracted Driving

Distracted driving means engaging in non-driving activities that distract the driver from the primary task of driving. Distracted driving can be visual (taking your eyes off the road), manual (taking your hands off the wheel), or cognitive (taking your mind off the main task of driving). Distracting activities include using a cell phone (talking or texting), eating, drinking, talking to passengers, applying makeup and other grooming activities, reading, using a navigation system, watching a video, and changing music selections on the radio, CD, or MP3 player. The most dangerous of these activities is texting, which involves all three types of distraction. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the age group with the greatest proportion of distracted drivers is the under-20 age group. Many states have enacted laws banning certain types of driving distractions and there are many restrictions on cell phone use while driving. Some people claim that a total ban on the use of cell phones while driving is the solution to the distracted driving problem. Others favor some restrictions on cell phone use but oppose a total ban.


Are tougher laws needed to combat distracted driving?

Tougher laws

Side Score: 33
Winning Side!
VS.

More education

Side Score: 23
2 points

I think that we do need more laws regulating distracted driving because in 2011, 3,331 people were killed in crashes involving a distracted driver, compared to 3,267 in 2010. An additional, 387,000 people were injured in motor vehicle crashes involving a distracted driver in 2011, compared to 416,000 people injured in 2010. With more regulation these numbers with be decreased.

Side: Tougher laws
tsharkey(8) Disputed
1 point

I don't think more laws are going to change anything. Think of all the technology in the world. They are putting more technology in cars every year. People get distracted by the radio, friends, or even things on the other side of the road. If there were more educational classes for driving safely on the road, there wouldn't be so many accidents. In the article, "Simulator Shows Dangers of Texting While Driving" states that, "According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, automobile accidents are the No. 1 killer of teens, and their first year on the road as a new driver is the most dangerous." If there were classes for driving safer, maybe teenagers would realize that there is more accidents involving teenagers than adults.

Supporting Evidence: Simulator Shows Dangers of Texting While Driving (sks.sirs.com)
Side: More education
dwoebke13(7) Disputed
1 point

I don't think that more laws is gong to help decrease the amount of distracted driving at all. States have banned drivers who are under 21 from texting and driving since 2009. The amount of accidents that involve distracted driving is increasing every year, and we already have a law that bans texting and driving. I read the article, "States Unlikely to Heed NTSB Call for Cell Ban" say, "The state has barred drivers 21 and younger from texting while driving since 2009. Several lawmakers proposed legislation the next year to extend that to all drivers but failed, partly because of concerns over whether it could be enforced." There are a lot of accidents that involve texting and driving still today even with the law. The article, "The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said there were 3,092 fatalities blamed on distracted driving last year, 408 of which involved cellphone use." I feel that if we educate teens about how dangerous distracted driving can then maybe they will think twice, but I don't feel that more laws are going to help at all.

Supporting Evidence: Click here for more information: (sks.sirs.com)
Side: More education
2 points

According to a work-life expert,Jeff Davidson, 812,000 people are distracted by a handheld device at any time. He also states that worldwide there are 1.2 million deaths and 80 million injuries caused by distracted driving. Driving while using a handheld device or even hand free device slows your response time to be like a drunk driver with a .08 alcohol content. If you talk on your phone and drive it increases your accident risk by 4 times, but if you text and drive it increases your accident risk by 23 times. I think we should either educate kids better or get better laws to help reduce accidents and deaths.

"The Costs of Distracted Driving." CPA Practice Advisor Apr. 2014. General OneFile. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.

Side: Tougher laws
2 points

In the quickly approaching years to come, technology serves as one of the most distracting devices to use while driving. Technology such as the Google Glass, Galaxy Gear smartwatch, or that Nike+ Fuelband that lights up and cries for your attention can be quite the distraction. Even if the device is hands-free it's still takes the mind of the road! The only problem I see is that people need to use these devices responsibly. They need to use such devices in alternative situations and/or areas than driving. Technology would be the death of the human if we would continue to ignore the labels/directions.

"ON THE PERILS OF DISTRACTED-DRIVING LAWS." AutoWeek 20 Jan. 2014: 0015. General OneFile. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.

Supporting Evidence: Technology While Driving (go.galegroup.com)
Side: Tougher laws
1 point

I for one think that kids/adults should pay more attention to the road than other things around them. People focus more on other stuff more than the road causing wrecks. It frustrates me when I see someone driving and talking on the phone or texting. It makes me think about all the negatives that could happen. Then I start to wonder if they have kids with them while they are texting and talking on the phone. So I believe that focusing on the road is way more important than any other thing that you may think is worth focusing on. We should have a stricter law forcing the ones who try to disobey that. Is it really that important than others life? What about your own life. Is it worth it? I think not! “In 2012, nearly 3,400 people (3,328, actually) died in a distraction-affected crashes, according to the U.S. Dept. of Transportation (DOT). An estimated 421,000 people were injured in crashes that involved a distracted driver. Approximately 660,000 drivers use a cell phone for talking or texting at ANY GIVEN MOMENT in time across the country.” ("Put down the phone and promise to drive distraction free." Fleet Owner [Online Exclusive] 14 Apr. 2014. General OneFile. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.) This passage is sad. That's a lot of people to be injured or dead. We should all think twice before reading that last text or answering that one phone call.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

I for one think that kids/adults should pay more attention to the road than other things around them. People focus more on other stuff more than the road causing wrecks. It frustrates me when I see someone driving and talking on the phone or texting. It makes me think about all the negatives that could happen. Then I start to wonder if they have kids with them while they are texting and talking on the phone. So I believe that focusing on the road is way more important than any other thing that you may think is worth focusing on. We should have a stricter law forcing the ones who try to disobey that. Is it really that important than others life? What about your own life. Is it worth it? I think not! “In 2012, nearly 3,400 people (3,328, actually) died in a distraction-affected crashes, according to the U.S. Dept. of Transportation (DOT). An estimated 421,000 people were injured in crashes that involved a distracted driver. Approximately 660,000 drivers use a cell phone for talking or texting at ANY GIVEN MOMENT in time across the country.” ("Put down the phone and promise to drive distraction free." Fleet Owner [Online Exclusive] 14 Apr. 2014. General OneFile. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.) This passage is sad. That's a lot of people to be injured or dead. We should all think twice before reading that last text or answering that one phone call.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

If we want to stop careless car accidents from distracted drivers, we need to pass tougher laws. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 80 percent of crashes and 65 percent of near-crashes involve some form of driver distraction occurring within three seconds before the vehicle crash. This is an outrageous percentage. If cell phone usage in a vehicle was completely prohibited, the number of car accidents a year would decrease drastically.

I vote that we raise the prices of tickets. It doesn’t matter how many times a person hears about a fatal car accident involving distraction, they will still continue to drive distracted. However, if we increase prices, people will start to realize that maybe that one text wasn’t that important. According to www.iowadot.gov, a fine of $2,750 could be given to anyone using a hand-held device while operating a motor vehicle. If you drive a bus or commercial truck, the fine could be up to $11,000. I could buy another car for those prices. The law is cracking down on distracted drivers!

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

This is a problem but I don't know how you could solve the problem. This research surpised me a lot, 10% of people that drive under of the age of 20 are more likely involved in fatal crashes and were reported as distracted at the time of the crash. So I feel like they should crack down on the younger people. But also I remember as being a little kid and mom turning around yelling at us too so I feel like there's more than just texting going on. Also, the number of people killed in distraction-affected crashes decreased slightly from 3,360 in 2011 to 3,328 in 2012 and, an estimated 421,000 people were injured in motor vehicle crashes involved a distracted driver, this was a nine percent increase from the estimated 387,000 people injured in 2011. So there's more then just texting and driving or being on your phone. I feel like they can crack down on whatever they want and it won't solve anything.

Supporting Evidence: Distracted Driving (www.distraction.gov)
Side: Tougher laws
1 point

I agree with Kent. Though I am for with the attempt of cracking down harder on these laws I fear that they won't do any good. Like Kent said there is more than just texting going on in that car. With little kids you have to be constantly watching and talking to them. That split second of turning around and yelling at them could be all it takes to get into a crash. These laws are a good idea, but I don't think they will help anything. "Distracted Driving." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 28 Jan. 2014. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

I think tougher laws would help with some of the distractions around drivers. Like texting you don't need your phone out while driving but they are nice to have in case of you wreck or something. Sending or receiving a text can take a driver's eyes off the road for 4.6 seconds, in the same amount of time it takes to travel a football field at 55 mph. Anything can happen when your not looking cross the yellow or white lines or someone else can while they aren't paying attention either. But while I read this it's crazy bout how many people call on the phone and text while driving.

"Put down the phone and promise to drive distraction free." Fleet Owner [Online Exclusive] 14 Apr. 2014. General OneFile. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.

Document URL

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE|A364871644&v;=2.1&u;=0504bcighs⁢=r&p;=ITOF&sw;=w&asid;=830f7b0b6bbdd4f90469918ba702c7b7

Side: Tougher laws
et2015(8) Disputed
1 point

I don’t think it matters if we have laws against distracted driving because we already have some and they don’t work. Iowa already has a ban on all cell phone use (handheld and hands-free) for novice drivers and a ban on texting for all drivers according to Distraction.gov so it does not matter if we have more laws on it because it’s not helping.

Supporting Evidence: Distraction.gov (www.distraction.gov)
Side: More education

I believe that if we had tougher laws it wouldn't really do much kids/adults would still use their phones and would be texting and/or talking on the phone while driving. If your foot is on the brake pedal, and you are texting, it is a violation" punishable by a fine ranging from $90 to $500 in Chicago. it takes 4.6 seconds on average to read or send a text while behind the wheel, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. So in less time than it takes to type "AYTMTB" (shorthand for "And you're telling me this because"), any one of thousands of "smart" signals in Chicago and the suburbs that react to vehicle volume can change from red to green. In Illinois, almost 6,000 crashes have occurred from 2008 to 2012 in which some form of driver distraction involving a cellphone was cited by police, according to the Illinois Department of Transportation. The toll included 30 fatalities and more than 2,500 injuries, IDOT said. state police troopers issued about 2,300 citations and more than 1,300 warnings for texting while driving. Hilkevitch, Jon, and Lauren Zumbach. "An Accident Waiting to Happen." Chicago Tribune. 14 Nov. 2013: 1. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

I believe that parents don't know that their kids are learning from them that their smartphones are distracting them when your driving even if there the most amazing things you saw, and if you're a frequent user, you know how hard they can be to put down. They're always clamoring for your attention with Facebook notifications, instant messages, emails, app updates, games to try, streaming music to listen to which is great if you're idly passing time while waiting in line or sitting on a bus, but it's bad news if you're driving. Studies show that using smartphones behind the wheel makes you just as dangerous as the average drunk. Most states have some sort of distracted-driving law on the books. That said, Apple's strong push to get more people using their iPhones in more cars is curious. Believe it or not, it's all about safety--well, and selling more phones. Source Citation (MLA 7th Edition)

"APPLE'S CARPLAY; SOON TO BE THE BEST WAY TO USE AN IPHONE IN YOUR CAR." AutoWeek 14 Apr. 2014: 0018. Student Edition. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.

this is another thing --"More than 75 percent of new drivers exhibit the same distracted driving behavior as their parents."

--"Most parents are unaware they are teaching their kids things that will make them more dangerous to others and more vulnerable to others."

--"Most parents want to protect their children and will make changes once they understand the realities of behavior transfer."

These are the words of Andy Pilgrim, the same championship-winning sports-car driver who helped road-test editor Jonathan Wong thrash Porsche's 911 GT3 and Chevrolet's Camaro Z/28. Andy began speaking to high-school students about driver safety 20 years ago, and he has delved deep into the statistics, causes and effects that have led many to conclude that U.S. driver education is inadequate.

Distracted driving, in particular, is an epidemic. I'm genuinely surprised if the driver in the lane next to mine isn't texting or otherwise fiddling with a phone. Most of the time, they are--and often with passengers who pick up on this behavior.

Through his Andy Pilgrim Foundation, Andy produced two videos for educators' use: "The Driving Zone" and "The Driving Zone 2." These DVDs cover topics like mental preparation for driving, explanation of distracted-driving issues and street-survival tools that are absent from most curricula. More than 10,000 driver-education teachers in 43 states use "The Driving Zone 2."

Andy takes his educator role another step forward with the introduction of "The Parent Driving Zone." Distracted driving is bad for all of us, but, as he says, "If a new driver with less than five years of experience drives with the same distractions and subsequent behavior as their parents, with none of their parents' skill or experience, they will, and do, crash at a massively higher rate. The fatality and life-changing injury stats for children under 21 years old tragically back this up.

"Since about 2009, we have had a massive increase in driver distractions linked directly to smartphones. This does not only mean texting while driving!"

Absorb this: Between 55 and 75 percent of new drivers name their parents as the biggest influencers on their behavior behind the wheel. That's more impactful than their peers, teachers, police, laws and tragic stories.

About three years ago, Andy began asking parents if they considered how their distracted-driving habits passed to their children. "The answers I received went from shock to total disbelief," he says. "It was obvious 90 percent never thought about it."

Hence a need for "The Parent Driving Zone." It includes behavior-altering information for parents of children of all ages. No one says all parents drive distracted, but one look around you during tomorrow's commute will prove this scourge's reach. Most never think about the fact they are their children's driving instructor or think their child is paying much attention to their driving. Well, they are. If you have a kid up to age 18, I implore you to check out theparentdrivingzone.com, where you can order a copy of the video. Its lessons might save your child's life.

Source Citation (MLA 7th Edition)

Morrison, Mac. "ONE RACER'S MISSION." AutoWeek 31 Mar. 2014: 0083. Student Edition. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

Distracted driving is a huge problem that is constantly brought up in our country. We have people talking/texting on their cellphone, other passengers, and even eating distracting us from the task at hand. It takes your hand off the wheel, your eyes off the road, and your mind off the driving. By performing these acts while driven endangers not only yourself and the people in your car, but also the other drivers passing by. In 2010 18% of all car crashes was because of a distracted driver. Also according to cdc.gov, more than 196 billion text messages where sent in 2011. That number has probably sky rocketed since then. We see more and more teenagers with their nose constantly in their phone and not paying attention to life around them. Out of those 196 billion text messages, how many do you think where sent while driving? A very interesting but also scary question when we really think about it. There needs to be tougher laws passed to try and prevent this from happening. Sadly though, I fear that even if those tougher laws do get passed, yes it would be a harsher punishment, but there will still be people becoming a distracted driver. "Distracted Driving." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 28 Jan. 2014. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.

Supporting Evidence: Distracted Drivers (www.cdc.gov)
Side: Tougher laws
schlender(9) Clarified
1 point

I agree that tougher laws need to be passed in order to have safer roads. 10% of all drivers under the age of 20 were involved in fatal crashes were said to be the cause of distracted driving, this age group has the biggest proportion of drivers who were distracted. Getting distracted while driving is something that can easily happen. Texting while driving? You think it'll only take a few seconds. Five seconds is the average time your eyes are off the road while sending that text. While traveling at 55 mph, that's enough time to cover the length of a football field blindfolded.

Supporting Evidence: Driving while distracted (www.distraction.gov)
Side: Tougher laws
1 point

In our technologically advanced society, there are a lot of people that have cell phones. There are also so many people who use those cell phones while driving which can cause accidents and even take lives. It has been said that 3,328 people were killed in distracted driving related crashes. Now you may think out of the number of Americans there are that, that is a low number but just think that those people could still be alive today with their family and friends but instead decided to send that one message that would change not only their life, but many others lives. If we can cut back on the cell phone usage on the road there will be less deaths per year.

"Distracted Driving | National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | Texting and Driving." Distracted Driving | National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | Texting and Driving. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

Distracted driving happens more with teens now a days than with adults. I think this because teens are on their phones texting and talking on the phone and they are not paying attention to the road that are paying more attention to their phones. In Distracted driving: stay focused when on the road. It says that distracted driving-related crashes caused at least 5,500 deaths and nearly 450,000 injuries in 2009, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation. Distracted driving causes a lot of crashes and their are many people not paying attention to the roads. I think that people should put their phones on silent when they are the road so that they don’t causes crashes and people end up dying or being injured because they were not paying attention to the road.

Johnson, Teddi Dineley. “Distracted driving: stay focused when on the road.” The Nation’s Health Feb.2012:28. General OneFile. Web.23.2014

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

Yes, yes. People use electronic devices while driving and end up in an accident. The usual stuff. Distracted driving is actually has some semblence with drunk driving but only one has a rather strict law and quite the fine to be paid. Also drunk driving laws are consistently on the rise but what of distracted driving? Distracted driving laws are rarely being followed because there's not a cop over there...is that a cop? Main point to be said is that distracted driving is drunk driving or somewhat close to it anyway.

Nelson, Gabe. "Can laws stop distracted driving if we won't?" Automotive News 17 Feb. 2014: 0022. General OneFile. Web. 25 Apr. 2014.

Supporting Evidence: Distraught Driving is Drunk Driving (go.galegroup.com)
Side: Tougher laws
1 point

I agree that distracted driving is similar to drunk driving. According to http://www.bisociety.org/ both cause distracted and impaired driving that can result in following to close or not being able to break. Drivers who text while driving have a 23% chance of causing a crash. This is equivalent to downing four beers then driving.

"Texting While Driving Vs. Drunk Driving: Which Is More Dangerous? - Brain Injury Society." Brain Injury Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Apr. 2014.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

Everyone is guilty of using their cell phone or electronic device while they drive. All of us think that we are excellent drivers, and can handle that one extra task behind the wheel. The truth is you are 23 times more likely to get in a car accident just by having your cell phone out, according to TextingandDrivingSafety.com. Whenever you look at your cell phone you take your eyes off the road for at least 5 seconds, and if you are going 55 miles per hour, you just went the length of a football field. I know I have done this before and honestly it is a little concerning when you are texting someone back and forth, not paying attention, and suddenly you get to your destination not remembering how you got there. As much as I like the freedom of having my phone out when I drive, I think we need to have tougher regulations regarding using your cell phones while you drive.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

I feel that texting while driving has been a nationwide habit ever since the early 2000’s. Either calling someone or texting, it is a habit that for most people, will be very hard to break. Even though people know the seriousness of texting while driving and seen the consequences of texting while driving, including death, and if no accident, then dealt a severe fine. Most people through the 18 to 20 bracket that have been injured due to texting while driving have admitted to texting while behind the wheel. I feel that parents should take charge of this and do everything in their power to explain the seriousness and the consequences of texting and driving. It’s kind of scary knowing that your child can possibly be in the car with someone who is on their phone while driving, the driver putting everyone in the car and anyone on the road at risk. In 2010, the U.S. alone, 18% of fatal crashes was from distracted drivers. Here is the article if any of you are interested to read more. http://www.fcc.gov/guides/texting-while-driving

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

There needs to be tougher laws when it comes to distracted driving. Not all distraction comes from using cell phones, though. Other distractions include eating, drinking, reading, adjusting the radio, or watching a movie. Regardless of the statistics, people are going to continue eating, drinking, and adjusting the radio. Are the cops really going to pull you over because you're eating while driving? Is that even a thing?

According to distraction.gov, texting is the most alarming distraction because it requires visual, manual, and cognitive attention. There is a texting law in place right now, although, I don't hear of many people getting pulled over and actually getting ticketed. I text and drive literally all the time, which isn't a good thing, at all.

During the time someone is driving, the driver should put all electronics away and focus on the ROAD - not texting, music, or friends in the car. There would be fewer accidents. Also, if the people who got in the accident because of one of these distractions get a heavy fine, I think that it would definitely teach them a lesson to not do it again, and inform everyone else about how terrible it was because of a small mistake and the huge consequences that resulted

"Distracted Driving | Facts and Stats | Texting and Driving." Distracted Driving | Facts and Stats | Texting and Driving. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.

Supporting Evidence: What is distractive Driving? (www.distraction.gov)
Side: Tougher laws
1 point

I think the state needs tougher laws because cops pull you over for speeding or seat belt or something in that nature. They never pull you over for texting or eating a piece of pizza or something like that. Many lives would be saved if they had tougher laws against distracted driving. According to distraction.gov 71% of teens and young people say they have sent and read text messages. 10% of all drivers under the age of 20 involved in fatal crashes were reported as being distracted. 25% of teens respond to a text message one or more times while they drive. This is an issue that needs to be addressed because lots of people die because they were distracted. NEED TOUGHER LAWS.

Supporting Evidence: Tougher laws (www.distraction.gov)
Side: Tougher laws
1 point

In today's society, it is very easy to be distracted while driving. According to NHTSA, there were 3,328 people killed and 421,000 people were injured as a result of distracted driving. The law enforcement cracked down from April 7th to the 15th. As stated from the NHTSA people who have parents that text think it is okay to text because they don't have somebody to yell at them. During the crackdown, the law enforcement spent $8.5 million in campaigns. The national campaign was "U Drive. U Text. U Pay." Our laws need to be enforced a lot harder than they are, then maybe people will stop texting while driving. If you text, you will be reliable for the consequences that happen.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

I think there should be stricter laws on texting and driving. The most common people who text and drive are teenagers. According to the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, “The study reports that teen drivers are four times more likely than adults to get into car crashes or near-crash events directly related to talking on a cellphone or texting. For every six seconds of drive time, a driver sending or receiving a text message spends 4.6 of those seconds with their eyes off the road.” Teenagers think that nothing will happen, but in a blink of an eye you could be taking someone else’s life or your own life. You would have to deal with that for the rest of your life. You can get a ticket for texting and driving but often teens don’t think that officers can tell. I don’t think some teenagers or other people realize how texting can affect your life.

MacDonald, Gregg. "Simulator Shows Dangers of Texting While Driving." Washington Post. 28 Mar. 2013: T.23. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

I believe there should be tougher laws against texting and driving. According to http://www.distraction.gov/content/get-the-facts/facts-and-statistics.html an estimated 421,000 people were injured in motor vehicle accidents due to distracted drivers. I think this number could be decreased not by education but by tougher laws, because people will listen more to a law with a punishment behind it more than someone teaching them not to do something, if they have to pay a fine or serve jail time they will get the message that texting and driving is an unacceptable thing to do. Where as people get an education on not to drink and drive and are told that it kills people yet they go out and keep doing it. I know that alcohol is considered an addiction but texting and driving is just as dangerous as drinking and driving.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

Many drivers on the road are distracted by many things. One of the greater things people are distracted by is texting while driving. Now that many people have smart phones they can surf the web right at their fingertips, and now it is getting in the way of driving. I think the law needs to be tougher about texting and driving or even using a cell phone. If they don’t force a law that prohibits using a phone while driving, the roads will be really unsafe because people won’t watch the road because they will be on their phones. According to the article “Drivers Still Surfing the Web While Driving” the percent of people who read or respond to e-mail, and who read or update social media networks while driving jumped tremendously. This is why cell phone should be banned while driving. There are many distractions in cars anyways with the radio and air controls, we don’t need cell phones as well. This is why we have so many accidents. So laws need to be enforced about distracted driving.

Copeland, Larry. "Drivers Still Surfing Web While Driving, Survey Finds." Gannett News Service. 11 Nov. 2013: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

Distracted driving had been around for a really long time now, and with the new phones like the Iphone 5, Galaxy S4 and S5, and all the other smart phones, texting while driving is easier to do. Education wont solve this problem with the teens of America. The law needs to get tougher. Why do I think this, well I sorta do it, I look up new music to play using YouTube on my phone. On a website that base is to stop this "crime" states that 71 percent of teens admitted to texting while driving. That's a lot of teens that could lose there life. It also says that 78 percent admitted to reading a text while driving. You could lose your life by just reading a "lol" or "ttyl". One of your best friends could die since of this. I rest my case on the "crime" of Texting While Driving.

Supporting Evidence: #justdrive (www.distraction.gov)
Side: Tougher laws
1 point

Many people use cell phones on the road and other devices that distract them. With the laws that are in place right now many continue to text and drive. However many of these distractions are for the most part, unavoidable. Texting while driving is the biggest distraction according to Distraction.gov a quarter of teens respond or send a text while driving and many others admit to having multi-message conversations when driving. To help prevent fatal crashes i believe people need a higher education on the matter. Laws can only do so much which is why people need to understand what could happen if they are texting while driving.

Distracted Driving | Facts and Stats | Texting and Driving." Distracted Driving | Facts and Stats | Texting and Driving. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.

Side: More education
1 point

I agree with Austin, I think most people learn from experience! Research shows from North Carolina Extension clientele and new Extension field faculty that more people choose to "do" and learn, instead of "see" and learn. The "see" refers to the commercials and also seeing people get pulled over, and the "do" means actually experiencing the situation. I am that way. I will never learn something unless I actually experience it. But that's not only with distracted driving, that's with other things. It's just the idea that more people would rather "do" and learn. So I don't think tougher laws will help anything.

Supporting Evidence: distracted driving (www.joe.org)
Side: More education
1 point

I totally agree with you, I mean I never could text and drive at first and I never thought to text and drive but seeing my parents do it and my sister I figured, well they can do so why can't I? The study showed that parents who practiced unsafe driving habits like texting and driving, or talking on the phone, had teens that also practiced the same bad habits behind-the-wheel. Teens were up front about their parents’ bad driving habits, and admitted they tended to pick up on those behaviors when driving alone. I'll admit that's where I picked it up. My dad run his business going down the road and he's always texting and driving or talking on the phone, and I think nothing of it and do it too. You look up to your parents and that's what this statistic is saying too.

Supporting Evidence: Distracted Driving (www.textinganddrivingsafety.com)
Side: More education
1 point

I think Kent is right, many teens pick up most of their driving habits from their parents or their friends. My parents don’t text and drive much but they talk on the phone, I find myself talking on the phone a lot while driving but I don’t text much.

Side: More education
1 point

I agree with Kent also, kids watch their parents and learn every move. From learning to drive to learning to talk. People need to know the consequences and this is dangerous, but yet it needs to be changed. In my case my dad doesn't text, my mother rarely does behind the wheel, but I text and drive sometimes, I learned this from peers. All the other things stated above are dumb to outlaw, but texting and driving is a bad deal. Studies show in 2011 1.3 million crashes happened due to texting. That number now days is much higher, and will probably never go down until something big makes it stop. Every time you send a text you travel at least the length of a football field. That can get dangerous. I agree this is a learned behavior, but it is dangerous. If you don't think it is dangerous see http://www.textinganddrivingsafety.com/texting-and-driving-stats/ this page is full of facts that are scary to think most people do everyday.

Side: More education
1 point

More education would be better than making laws. If there were classes that every driver had to attend to teach them about safe driving, I think that that would help. It would show them that even just a simple "k" text, can cause an accident. Even though more people have accidents due to distraught toddlers or pets or eating food, there are still a lot of accidents due to talking on the phone or texting. There should be more signs up around the world saying to quit texting and driving. The article, "Yes, Cellphones Can Be Dangerous. No, a Nationwide Ban Won't Work" states that "In a perfect world, nobody would use a cellphone while driving a car, except in emergencies. But in a nation where the number of cellphones (300 million) now outstrips even the number of vehicles (254 million), that's not going to happen." This statement is so true, but if we had more education about how distracted driving causes many accidents, I think people would realize that their life is more important than their phone. If you want to read more about this education, click on the link below.

Side: More education
1 point

I agree with you that more education will be more effective than making more laws. When you are distracted while driving, things happen in a split second. I read the article, "Simulator Shows Danger of Texting While Driving." This article made me realize how fast things can happen when you are distracted while driving a vehicle. The article says, "I crashed into the back of a bus within two minutes the first time I tried it," Balsavich said. "It really did a good job of showing you just how quickly and suddenly that can happen." I could have never thought that accidents could happen so quickly until I read this article. I agree with you that there should be classes that teach drivers about driving safely. I believe that it would help the drivers learn how quickly an accident can happen when you aren't watching the road like you mentioned. I think that drivers under the age of 21 should be required to take the classes. The reason that I think that is because teenagers are more likely to get into accidents involving distracted driving than adults are. The article says, "The study reports that teen drivers are four times more likely than adults to get into car crashes or near-crash events directly related to talking on a cellphone or texting." There are many reasons that I think that classes should be required to teach drivers how dangerous it is to take your eyes of the road. I truly believe that more education is the way to go instead or more laws.

Supporting Evidence: Read the article here: (sks.sirs.com)
Side: More education
1 point

People need to realize the consequences of Distracted Driving, really how can you put a law on talking to a passenger? Thats stupid. In a recent study done by our government on distraction.gov 78% of people have texted and driven before. This is a very high amount, I do agree texting and driving is dangerous and stupid. I see nothing wrong with a good driving talking on the phone while driving. Most people drive with one arm anyway. In 2012 3,328 people died from distracted driving, most of these cases were texting and driving. My stand on this is the law on texting and driving should be enforced but talking on the phone, eating, drinking, talking to passengers, using a navigation system, and changing music selections on the radio, CD, or MP3 player should not have a law. Situations while you're driving like rush hour, blizzards, etc. then you should be very dialed in driving. Just educated the people on what could happen, don’t text and drive.

Side: More education
BAMF(8) Disputed
1 point

I think that you could educate people but also create tougher laws. Yes people will still do it but it may cut down on the number of people that do it. Many think it would be like speeding. Others think it would be like seat belts because if you don't wear one you may be more easily able to lose your life in a crash, same with texting and driving if you do it increases your odds for a crash and even losing your life or killing someone else.

"Texting and Driving Statistics." Texting and Driving Statistics. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.

Side: Tougher laws
BAMFx2(7) Disputed
1 point

How are you going to put a law on talking to passengers? Or all these beside talking on the phone: talking on the phone, eating, drinking, using a navigation system, and changing music selections on the radio, CD, or MP3. How are you going to put a law on these? It’s nearly impossible unless you duct tape your hands to the wheel, and drive alone everywhere. Also you could start making vehicles with a cockpit like a plane so the driver is all alone. Be realistic there is no possible way to monitor these or is it necessary. Texting and driving on the other hand could be treated like alcohol if you wanted to treat it like that. Texting and driving is very dangerous as we all know and has caused many deaths. It takes an average of 4.6 seconds to send a text while driving. Cell phones are the number one cause of wrecks. Passengers in on down the line along with eating. The info above was found on "The Top 5 Causes of Distracted Driving." GJEL Accident Attorneys RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Apr. 2014.

Side: More education
1 point

Personally, I think that people need to stay focused on the road rather than on their phones, doing their makeup, and worrying about what’s going on inside the vehicle and focus on the road more. People end up getting in car accidents because of being distracted. Honestly, I think that people need to watch the road because you could be taking someone’s life while you’re texting or doing something. According to the article “Put down the phone and promise to drive distration free”You take 3 seconds or more when you’re not watching what’s going on in front of you. That 3 seconds seems like a minute or more. Nearly 3,400 people actually (3,328) died from distracted driving. And approximately 660,000 drivers use a cell phone while driving. That 660,000 people could be causing a car crash right now.

“Put down the phone and promise to drive distraction free.” Fleet owner [online Exclusive] 14 Apr. 2014 General OneFile web.23 Apr. 2014

Side: More education
1 point

I agree with what your saying but many people have no choice but to do stuff going down the road they live a tight work schedule or have to run kids to places and have to talk on there phone or get ready in the morning. Or even truck drives they have to talk on the phone to get there loads find out where there going or talk to the boss or dispatcher yes its a distraction but they have no choice in the matter 37 states ban all cell phone use for driver and nearly all states 48 so far have at least some form of distracted driving as a causal category on police accident investigation forms. So yes there's a problem and the states are enforcing it but you have to realize so people have busy schedules and so they just do it while they are going down the road.

Supporting Evidence: more eduaction (www.hodgsonruss.com)
Side: More education
1 point

According to distraction.gov 10% of all drivers under the age of 20 involved in fatal crashes were reported as distracted at the time of the crash. This age group has the largest proportion of drivers who were distracted. Drivers in their 20s make up 27% of the distracted drivers in fatal crashes. At any given daylight moment across America, approximately 660,000 drivers are using cell phones or manipulating electronic devices while driving, a number that has held steady since 2010. I feel like people need more education on the seriousness of this matter. I can’t say I haven’t ever done it but i realize that it’s a huge, serious, scary thing. It could be fatal and some people don’t understand that. These laws that they are trying to enforce don’t do anything so why would making more laws help? It wouldn’t, people need to know that their life COULD be ended in seconds. Along with any other people or drivers they put in danger while being distracted with electronics.

Side: More education
1 point

I think that we need more education about distracted driving instead of just making the laws tougher. Tougher laws are not going to make people stop using their phones while they are driving because they will just find other ways not to get caught doing it. People see what can happen when you are texting or talking on the phone while driving on tv or in videos, and they are scared of the outcomes. When after seeing those videos, people still use their phones while driving. The article, Yes, Cellphones Can Be Dangerous. No a Nationwide Ban Won’t Work says, “If even people’s own fear of danger won’t prevent cell phone use, it’s hard to imagine that bans will be more effective.” Even if they did make tougher laws, they would be very difficult to enforce. The article says, “They will be a nightmare to enforce. Laws that are unenforceable (see: prohibition) do not increase respect for the law or change attitudes.” I thought that was a very good comparison because when they tried to make prohibition a law, people just bought illegal alcohol. Even with the law, the people wanted alcohol got the alcohol that they wanted when they wanted it. If you made it illegal to use the phone while driving, people would just rebel and do it illegally. People would still use their phone if they wanted to and when they wanted to. Look at the seat belt laws, the laws are strict that if you don’t wear one, you get a ticket. There are still many people who don’t wear their seat belts because they don’t want to. People will use hands-free, so that if a cop drives by them, they can’t see the phone. They think that if they use hands-free, they are being safer than without hands-free. The article says, “Even using hands-free devices doesn’t seem to make much difference ; research shows the conversation itself distracts the driver’s brain.” I truly believe that if people were educated more about how dangerous distracted driving is then they would think twice before they do it. I think that before you get your license, you should have to take like three classes over distracted driving and the dangers. I believe that tougher laws will not make people stop, but more education will get them to think twice.

Supporting Evidence: Click here for more information: (sks.sirs.com)
Side: More education
1 point

People seem to forget that texting while driving is not the only distraction. Www.distraction.gov says that even eating and drinking, or combing your hair is a distraction too. However, texting is the most alarming because it involves "visual, manual, and cognitive attention from the driver." I'm not so sure though that laws are enough! People speed all the time and are constantly getting caught, but does that stop them? Nope, so do you think tougher laws are going to stop distracted driving? Absolutely not. It's the education that needs to be tougher. Children learn from their parents, the parents can help by teaching their children about distracted driving. Hopefully we can see accident rates decline with more education.

Supporting Evidence: distracted driving (www.distraction.gov)
Side: More education
1 point

There are many distractions while driving. Distracted driving can be caused by several things but people tend to thing texting is the biggest distraction. Common distractions are changing radio stations or songs on your iPod, eating, drinking, and other passengers. Why is texting worse than watching a gps or changing stations? "The best way to end distracted driving is to educate all Americans about the danger it poses."

http://www.distraction.gov/content/get-the-facts/facts-and-statistics.html

Side: More education
Jelley18(7) Disputed
1 point

Yes you could have the younger generation watch videos during drivers education but lets be honest would you really take any of that seriously? I know when I was in Drivers ed, we watched videos on the distractions you face while driving, and i'll be honest I didn't pay any attention to them. I figured I will never get in an accident because i'm changing the radio station, or messing with my phone. I feel that not very many people who watch videos involving distractions while driving pay much attention to them. To me the best way to prevent and reduce accidents, dealing with electronics, is by having stricter laws regarding electronics.

Side: Tougher laws
1 point

Unfortunately, I don't think more education will help. We hear about car accidents all the time and yet we still continue to text and drive. We see the commercials of the families who have lost a loved one because they sent the text "ya". Still, we text and drive. For some reason, we have created this illusion where we think that bad things can't happen to us. However, if you were forced to pay a $3000 fine, would you still continue to shoot that one text? That's a lot of work hours if you make minimum wage. I wish that more education made us change our ways, but I really don't believe it will.

Keep in mind that it's not just texting and driving. Listening to the radio, fixing your hair, grabbing your sunglasses out of the glove box, and taking a drink of your pop all distract you from what should be your main focus, the road. Driving distracted is the new drunk driving!

Hanes, Stephanie. "Texting While Driving: The New Drunk Driving." Christian Science Monitor. 05 Nov. 2009: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.

Side: More education
1 point

Unfortunately, I don't think more education will help. We hear about car accidents all the time and yet we still continue to text and drive. We see the commercials of the families who have lost a loved one because they sent the text "ya". Still, we text and drive. For some reason, we have created this illusion where we think that bad things can't happen to us. However, if you were forced to pay a $3000 fine, would you still continue to shoot that one text? That's a lot of work hours if you make minimum wage. I wish that more education made us change our ways, but I really don't believe it will.

Keep in mind that it's not just texting and driving. Listening to the radio, fixing your hair, grabbing your sunglasses out of the glove box, and taking a drink of your pop all distract you from what should be your main focus, the road. Driving distracted is the new drunk driving! According to Joshua Weller, scientist, texting and driving at 55 mph is similar to driving the length of one football field with your eyes closed! That's nuts!

Hanes, Stephanie. "Texting While Driving: The New Drunk Driving." Christian Science Monitor. 05 Nov. 2009: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.

Side: More education
0 points

More education would definitely be the way to go for this matter. As many laws as can be made, every law can be broken and it isn't difficult at all to hold a phone low enough that an officer won't see it. According to www.fcc.gov, most teens learn from experience. If they see their parents doing it, or are never told by a person with a large impact in their life that it it dangerous and wrong, the studies do show they'll be more likely to do so. With simple education and good example being set, we would all be better off.

Side: More education
1 point

I like what your saying Austin but what if we have more education doesn't mean people won't do it. But I do agree with you on when you see people do it while in the car you will prob do the same thing when you drive. With the phone holding low okay people do it but couldn't it be obvious to some cops by hurrying and lowering your hand, or the light if they don't shut their phone.

Side: More education
Jonboy(7) Disputed
1 point

Not necessarily. People could change the angle of the phone so it looks like they aren't looking at it, and the brightness of the phone would most likely not be seen during the day. Also, the brightness setting can also be changed.

Side: Tougher laws
AustinCapta(11) Disputed
1 point

DISPUTE NOT SUPPORT

But, wouldn't it be good to set example from experience? There is no better way to learn than from mistake. A large fine or possibly something worse would easily change someones mind. I found on http://www.psychologicalscience.org/ that fear tactics are quite effective. They have more of a positive effect in stopping someone from actually doing something. Plus to admit, teens are commonly known for rebellion. Would it really be a good idea to trust them to do as their parents say?

Side: Tougher laws
Sunny-D(6) Disputed
1 point

Austin, first of all, you sound like you're arguing with yourself than anything. Otherwise I'm reading this completely wrong. Second, as reiteration from Shae's dispute, even with education there is always a handful of rebels that just quickly hide devices in use. Still I do agree with you on the point that a role model is effective but it's not entirely drastic. Last of all, who would really trust a teenager?

Side: More education
1 point

And as for you Shae, you are absolutely correct, but, generally, when an officer is looking at you while driving, his eyes will go to the speed camera. If your speed doesn't fall above the limit, the officer won't pay any mind to you. I found on http://www.theatlanticcities.com/ that many officers will be looking specifically for a few things, and a cell phone is rarely one of them. As easy as it would be to take them down for the cell phone, they most likely won't even notice because they're focused on something else. When they look for a specific thing to make the arrest, it is rare that they will see any other problem without opening their eyes to all of the possibilities.

Side: Tougher laws