Ok - I am following your argument...until the end. So books should not be banned unless they are "legitimately way too graphic" - who should determine that? Is there a guideline that should be followed? Who sets the bar? What is "graphic" to one person, may not seem so to another...so, how do we determine what gets banned? Also, since the argument mentions banning books that are too graphic, should this argument be on the pro side rather than the con side?